da Tipotogo » gio 16 mag 2013, 20:25
Salve a tutti, mi aggancio alla presente discussione... credo sia giusto così...
ho un problema che mi perseguita ormai da giorni, ne ho lette e provate di tutti i modi…
Non riesco ad avere un throughput decente con la seguente configurazione:
Sede A
Antenna A/1
NanoBridge M5
Access Point WDS
Noise Floor: -92 dBm
Transmit CCQ: 96.6 %
IP: 10.5.255.21
Antenna A/2
NanoBridge M5
Network Mode: Bridge
Access Point WDS
Noise Floor: -94 dBm
Transmit CCQ: 99 %
IP: 10.5.255.22
MikroTik RouterOS 5.24
RB450G
# ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFACE
0 10.6.255.1/16 10.6.0.0 ether5
1 10.5.255.1/16 10.5.0.0 ether4
2 10.5.255.102/16 10.5.0.0 bonding1
[admin@MikroTik] /interface> print
Flags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
# NAME TYPE MTU L2MTU MAX-L2MTU
0 R ether1 ether 1500 1520 1520
1 R ether2 ether 1500 1520 1520
2 ether3 ether 1500 1520 1520
3 R ether4 ether 1500 1520 1520
4 R ether5 ether 1500 1520 1520
5 R bonding1 bonding 1500
6 R bridge1 bridge 1500 65535
Bonding1
Slaves: ether1, ether2
Mode: balance rr
Link Monitoring : arp
Trasm Hash Policy : layer2
LACP Rate: 30s
ARP Interval 100ms
ARP IP Target: 10.5.255.101
[admin@MikroTik] /ip address> /tool bandwidth-test 10.5.255.101 direction=both
status: running
duration: 1m18s
tx-current: 40.9Mbps
tx-10-second-average: 69.1Mbps
tx-total-average: 44.5Mbps
rx-current: 29.3Mbps
rx-10-second-average: 45.6Mbps
rx-total-average: 56.4Mbps
lost-packets: 1280
random-data: no
direction: both
tx-size: 1500
rx-size: 1500
***************************************************************************
Sede B
Antenna B/1
NanoBridge M5
Network Mode: Bridge
Wireless Mode: Station WDS
Noise Floor: -93 dBm
Transmit CCQ: 94.2 %
TX/RX Rate: 216.0 Mbps / 243.0 Mbps
Antenna B/2
NanoBridge M5
Network Mode: Bridge
Wireless Mode: Station WDS
Noise Floor: -95 dBm
Transmit CCQ: 98 %
TX/RX Rate: 240.0 Mbps / 240.0 Mbps
MikroTik RouterOS 5.24
RB450G
# ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFACE
0 10.5.255.100/16 10.5.0.0 ether5
1 10.5.255.101/16 10.5.0.0 bonding1
[admin@MikroTik] > /interface print
Flags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
# NAME TYPE MTU L2MTU MAX-L2MTU
0 R ether1 ether 1500 1520 1520
1 R ether2 ether 1500 1520 1520
2 ether3 ether 1500 1520 1520
3 ether4 ether 1500 1520 1520
4 R ether5 ether 1500 1520 1520
5 R bonding1 bonding 1500
6 R bridge1 bridge 1500 1520
Bonding1
Slaves: ether1, ether2
Mode: balance rr
Link Monitoring : arp
Trasm Hash Policy : layer2
LACP Rate: 30s
ARP Interval 100ms
ARP IP Target: 10.5.255.102
[admin@MikroTik] /ip address> /tool bandwidth-test address=10.5.255.1 direction=both
status: running
duration: 1m4s
tx-current: 70.3Mbps
tx-10-second-average: 64.4Mbps
tx-total-average: 55.1Mbps
rx-current: 56.7Mbps
rx-10-second-average: 39.7Mbps
rx-total-average: 47.7Mbps
lost-packets: 2834
random-data: no
direction: both
tx-size: 1500
rx-size: 1500
poi dulcis infundo... il test di velocità con speed-lan tra 2 pc non supera di 10Mbps ...
ho provato anche ad impostare gli altri tipi di bonding,con relative trasm hasp policy, ma solo rr sfrutta tutte e 2 le eth del bondign,
tutti gli altri utilizzano solo la eth0 e nonostante ciò il throughput è migliore...
Vi prego... AIUTOOOO!!! il mio neurone è in fumo....
Grazie!!!